Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have long found themselves at the center of speculation from online commentators—but recent reactions to a simple family celebration have taken conspiracy theorizing to a new extreme.

Following the release of a heartwarming video montage celebrating Princess Lilibet’s fourth birthday, social media skeptics have reignited outlandish rumors—some even questioning the existence of the Sussex children altogether.

A Magical Family Outing

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex marked their daughter’s big day with a trip to Disneyland. The footage, reportedly shared by Meghan on Sunday (June 8), features glimpses of the family enjoying the theme park. Lilibet, wearing a soft blue cap, is seen engaging in sweet moments with her older brother Archie, now seven, including meeting a Frozen character and posing for a photo near a log ride.

While the children’s faces remain hidden—covered with emoji overlays—likely out of respect for their privacy, the video clearly aims to offer fans a window into the family’s personal joy. “Thank you @disneyland for giving our family two days of pure joy!” Meghan wrote in the caption.

The AI Theory Makes a Return

Despite the wholesome nature of the post, certain corners of the internet latched onto it to resurrect an increasingly bizarre theory: that Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet are either computer-generated or portrayed by body doubles.

Critics pointed to perceived inconsistencies—such as the supposed mismatch in seasonal clothing or background distortions in the images—to support their claims. One commenter claimed that a floorboard looked digitally altered, suggesting a nanny had been edited out. Another insisted Lilibet appeared to be “levitating” in one shot, allegedly indicating digital manipulation.

Privacy and Perception

The Sussexes have chosen a cautious approach when it comes to showing their children in public, opting for limited and carefully controlled images over the years. That decision, however, seems to have fueled further suspicion among their most vocal critics.

Skeptics argue that their limited visibility—and the lack of widely circulated public sightings—suggests something more deliberate. Some even claim that Meghan wore a prosthetic “baby bump” during her pregnancy, a baseless accusation that has circulated since her royal tenure.

A Pattern of Accusation

This isn’t the first time photos shared by the Sussexes have been accused of being digitally altered. Past family portraits and candid shots have also drawn skepticism online. A recent image shared on their wedding anniversary led to speculation about photo editing, while an old photo of Archie sparked bizarre criticism over his toes.

Reflecting on the Bigger Picture

While celebrity scrutiny is nothing new, the level of speculation surrounding Meghan and Harry’s children reveals a deeper issue: how public figures, especially those who attempt to balance fame with privacy, often face disproportionate mistrust.

It’s worth noting that none of the claims currently circulating have been supported by evidence. In fact, they largely originate from anonymous internet accounts and forums known more for sensationalism than credible reporting.

In the end, the real story might be far simpler than these theories suggest—a family choosing to celebrate their daughter’s birthday in a way that honors both joy and privacy.