He said the case held even greater personal weight than his ongoing legal battles with the tabloid media, which he has previously referred to as his “life’s work.”

In an interview with The Telegraph, Harry expressed his distress over what he learned through the legal proceedings, especially the evidence submitted in private hearings.

“People would be shocked by what’s being held back,” he said. “My worst fears have been confirmed by the whole legal disclosure in this case and that’s really sad.”

As the hearings wrapped up, Harry admitted he felt “exhausted” and “overwhelmed” by the experience.

Even if the appeal is successful, it’s possible that Ravec may still refuse to restore the Sussexes’ security arrangements.

Harry said he remains “driven by exposing injustice” and vowed to continue fighting, regardless of the final decision.

Critics have accused the Duke of hypocrisy following his recent visit to Ukraine, where he met with wounded soldiers — despite claiming that the lack of official security makes travel to the UK unsafe for him and his family.

However, a source told MailOnline that suggesting the Ukraine visit undermines Harry’s legal argument is “simply incorrect,” insisting that his security detail there was “more robust” than what he would typically have in Britain.

Another insider confirmed that Harry had greater protection during the Ukraine trip compared to what he receives when visiting the UK.

Earlier this week, MailOnline also reported that Harry did not meet with King Charles during his visit to London for the court hearing. The Duke arrived from Los Angeles last Sunday, while the King was reportedly resting at his private residence in Highgrove ahead of a busy week, including a state visit to Italy.

During the appeal hearing, it was reiterated that Prince Harry lost his taxpayer-funded protection following his unprecedented decision to step down from royal duties and “spend most of the time abroad,” according to what the High Court heard.